- 8 - for 1996 that respondent received from him on April 17, 1997, constitutes a tax return for that year and that consequently he filed a tax return for 1996. With respect to 1997, petitioner suggests that he filed a tax return for that year, but he “does not recall the date he filed and did not retain a copy of his tax return.”7 On the instant record, we reject petitioner’s position regarding the additions to tax under section 6651(a)(1) for the years at issue. The record establishes that respondent did not file petitioner’s document for 1996 as petitioner’s tax return for that year and that petitioner did not submit to respondent any document that respondent filed as petitioner’s tax return for 1997. With respect to petitioner’s document for 1996, respondent’s explanation as to why respondent did not file that document as petitioner’s tax return for 1996 is that petitioner did not sign that document under penalties of perjury, as required by section 6065. We agree with respondent’s decision not to file peti- tioner’s document for 1996 as his tax return for that year. Although petitioner claims that he intended petitioner’s document for 1996 to be his tax return for that year, he did not sign that 7Petitioner argues that, regardless of whether and when he filed a tax return for 1997, the issue under sec. 6651(a)(1) is moot as to 1997 because he was not required to file a return for that year. On the instant record, we disagree.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011