Fred Allnutt - Page 2

                                        - 2 -                                         
                                        Additions to tax and penalties                
          Year     Deficiency   Sec. 6653(a)   Sec. 6651(a)(1)   Sec. 6662            
          1987     $1,197,033    $63,143.55     $269,331.98          --               
          1988        274,146     16,379.00       61,682.50          --               
          1989         10,253         --           2,307.20      $2,050.60            
          1990        112,208         --          25,247.25      22,441.60            
          1992         82,632         --          18,592.68      16,526.40            
          1993          1,774         --              --            354.80            
          1994         17,581         --              --          3,516.20            
          1995         19,992         --              --          3,998.40            
          1996         16,702         --              --          3,340.40            
          1997         20,177         --              --          4,035.40            
               After concessions, the issues remaining for decision are:              
               1.  Whether petitioner’s bases in equipment he sold in 1987-           
          90 exceeded the amounts conceded by respondent (the basis issue).           
          We hold that they did not.                                                  
               2.  Whether petitioner is liable for:  (a) Additions to tax            
          for negligence under section 6653(a) for 1987-88; (b) the                   
          accuracy-related penalty under section 6662(a) for 1989-90 and              
          1992-97; and (c) additions to tax for failure to timely file                
          returns under section 6651(a) for 1987-90 and 1992.  We hold that           
          he is.                                                                      
               3.   Whether petitioner complied with requirements for                 
          issuing subpoenas to several prospective witnesses.  We hold that           
          he did not, and thus the subpoenas were not enforceable.                    
               4.   Whether the Court properly denied petitioner’s motions            
          to recuse the trial Judge and for a hearing on whether certain              
          conduct of respondent’s trial counsel was fraudulent.  We hold              
          that those motions were properly denied.                                    






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011