Fred Allnutt - Page 6

                                        - 6 -                                         
               In the notice of deficiency, respondent determined that                
          petitioner’s adjusted basis in each asset was zero.  Petitioner             
          also reported losses totaling $297,264.40 from 12 items of                  
          property sold in 1987-90.  Respondent made no determination                 
          relating to the property petitioner reported selling at a loss.             
          D.   Procedural History                                                     
               1.   Trial on October 24, 2001                                         
               In Allnutt v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2002-311 (Allnutt               
          II), a prior opinion filed in the instant case, we held that (1)            
          the notice of deficiency for tax years 1987-90 and 1992-95 was              
          timely issued; and (2) because of our decision in Allnutt I,                
          petitioner was barred by res judicata from arguing that he had              
          losses in 1981-86 which he could carry forward to the years in              
          issue (1987-90 and 1992-97).                                                
               The issues decided in Allnutt II were tried on October 24,             
          2001.  Petitioner prepared 10 subpoenas for Internal Revenue                
          Service (IRS) employees to appear as witnesses at the Court’s               
          trial session beginning on October 22, 2001.  Petitioner did not            
          tender witness fees or mileage to the summoned witnesses.  Also,            
          the return of service for those subpoenas did not contain the               
          date and time of service and did not contain a sworn statement              
          signed and dated by the person making service that he or she had            
          delivered the subpoena to the summoned witness and tendered fees            








Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011