Basin Electric Power Cooperative - Page 33

                                       - 33 -                                         
          tially less than its minimum annual basic rent obligation under             
          the 1985 sale and leaseback agreements.                                     
               We conclude that the material facts outlined above bring the           
          expenditures at issue within the purview of U.S. Bancorp &                  
          Consol. Subs. v. Commissioner, 111 T.C. 231 (1998).  On the                 
          record before us, we reject petitioner’s argument that Metrocorp,           
          Inc. v. Commissioner, 116 T.C. 211 (2001), and T.J. Enters., Inc.           
          v. Commissioner, 101 T.C. 581 (1993), require that such expendi-            
          tures be deducted under section 162(a).21  The material facts in            
          Metrocorp, Inc. v. Commissioner, supra, and T.J. Enters., Inc. v.           
          Commissioner, supra, are distinguishable from the material facts            
          in the instant case, and petitioner’s reliance on those cases is            
          misplaced.22                                                                


               21Petitioner argues in the alternative that, even if the               
          expenditures at issue paid in 1992 are required to be capital-              
          ized, the expenditures at issue paid in 1993 and 1995 were not              
          directly related to the modification of the 1985 sale and                   
          leaseback and should not be capitalized.  On the record before              
          us, we reject that argument.  We have found that there was an               
          integrated plan to modify and enhance the 1985 sale and leaseback           
          agreements in order to reduce substantially petitioner’s minimum            
          annual basic rent obligation to the owner participants.  Peti-              
          tioner’s obligation to pay the expenditures at issue was imposed            
          by and had its origins in the 1992 amendments.  See Wells Fargo &           
          Co. and Subs. v. Commissioner, 224 F.3d 874, 884, 886-887 (8th              
          Cir. 2000), affg. in part and revg. in part 112 T.C. 89 (1999).             
          Petitioner undertook such an obligation in order to induce the              
          owner participants and Mercer County to agree to the integrated             
          plan to modify and enhance the 1985 sale and leaseback agreements           
          so as to reduce substantially petitioner’s minimum annual basic             
          rent obligation to the owner participants.                                  
               22Unlike respondent who argues here that petitioner paid the           
                                                             (continued...)           




Page:  Previous  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011