Charles A. Boyd and Darby A. Harvey - Page 10

                                       - 10 -                                         
          Petitioners’ Tax Returns                                                    
               On its Forms 1120S, U.S. Income Tax Return for an S                    
          Corporation, for the years at issue, Continental deducted (as               
          part of “Other deductions”) driver-related expenses including               
          fuel, tolls, “motels & layover”, “per diem”, and “hiring cost--             
          drivers”.  The amounts deducted as per diem payments were                   
          $2,231,279 for the taxable year ending December 31, 1995;                   
          $2,208,178 for the taxable year ending December 31, 1996;                   
          $529,232 for the taxable year ending March 31, 1997; and                    
          $2,796,499 for the taxable year ending December 31, 1997.  These            
          claimed per diem amounts represent 80 percent of the actual per             
          diem payments made to the drivers.  To arrive at the 80-percent             
          claimed deduction, Continental applied the section 274(n) 50-               
          percent limitation to 40 percent of the total per diem amounts              
          paid during the tax years and deducted the remaining 60 percent             
          in full.                                                                    
                                       OPINION                                        
               Section 274(n) allows a taxpayer to deduct only 50 percent             
          of the amount that otherwise would qualify as an allowable                  
          deduction for meals or business entertainment.  The issue is                
          whether this 50-percent limitation applies to the full amount of            
          per diem allowances paid with respect to Continental’s drivers,             
          as respondent contends.  For the reasons discussed below, we                
          agree with respondent.                                                      






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011