- 12 - language to achieve the same definition. The legislative history does not indicate an intent to define “earned income” in section 63(c)(5)(B) by reference to net earnings from self-employment. Accordingly, we conclude that “earned income” in section 63(c)(5)(B) means something different from “the amount of the taxpayer’s net earnings from self-employment for the taxable year (within the meaning of section 1402(a))”.8 Thus, the Congress (1) in TRA 1986 departed from the previous section 911 definition, (2) in TRA 1986 did not move to the section 32 definition, and (3) never adopted the “maxitax” section 1348 approach of using both section 911 and net earnings. In RA 1971 the Congress responded to what was perceived to be an abuse situation involving attempts to “game” the tax system. The legislative language went beyond the intrafamily transfers complained of, but even then the Congress decided that a dependent who received such an intrafamily transfer but also 8 Respondent implicitly recognized that the sec. 63 and sec. 32 concepts of earned income were not the same. The earned income credit worksheet specifically directs the taxpayer to “Enter any profit (or loss)”. (Emphasis added.) 1999 Publication 596, Earned Income Credit (EIC), at p. 30, Worksheet B, line 2.b. In contrast the standard deduction worksheet tells the taxpayer that “Generally, your earned income is the total of the amount(s) you reported on Form 1040, lines * * * 12". 1999 1040 Forms and Instructions, at p. 30 (emphasis added). The standard deduction worksheet does not explain “Generally”, and does not specifically direct the taxpayer to include business losses in the earned income computation.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011