- 4 - Deficiency for tax year 1995” for petitioner and Ms. Connor, but that he would not be representing her. Mr. Jacob also sent a copy of his letter to petitioner. Petitioner, however, has no recollection of receiving the letter, and both petitioner and Mr. Jacob deny discussing it. On her own, Ms. Connor petitioned this Court seeking a redetermination of the 1995 deficiency determination. With respect to petitioner, Mr. Jacob did not file a petition on his behalf or take any other action to advise him of his available options with respect to the 1995 notice of deficiency. Mr. Jacob attempted to convince the Court that it was not his normal practice to file petitions without being asked by the client, and the receipt of a copy of a notice of deficiency regarding a client for whom he held a power of attorney did not “obligate [him] to do anything”. Thus, the 1995 tax liability was never challenged by petitioner, and on February 4, 1999, respondent assessed the amount of income tax due for 1995 against petitioner. Respondent’s internal documents show several unsuccessful attempts in 1999 and 2000 to try to reach Mr. Jacob regarding collection actions. On June 27, 2001, respondent issued a Final Notice of Intent to Levy (which petitioner did receive), advising petitioner of the proposed collection of his outstanding 1995 income tax liability. On July 9, 2001, respondent received aPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011