Geoffrey K. Calderone - Page 13

                                       - 13 -                                         
          entitled to challenge the underlying tax liability.  As such, it            
          is unnecessary to decide the remaining issue of whether                     
          respondent abused his discretion by denying petitioner’s request            
          to consider the underlying merits of the 1995 tax liability.  In            
          accordance with the parties’ agreement, this case will be                   
          remanded to respondent’s Appeals Office to conduct a hearing in             
          accordance with section 6330.                                               
               To reflect the foregoing,                                              

                                             An appropriate order will                
                                        be issued.                                    





























Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  

Last modified: May 25, 2011