- 13 - entitled to challenge the underlying tax liability. As such, it is unnecessary to decide the remaining issue of whether respondent abused his discretion by denying petitioner’s request to consider the underlying merits of the 1995 tax liability. In accordance with the parties’ agreement, this case will be remanded to respondent’s Appeals Office to conduct a hearing in accordance with section 6330. To reflect the foregoing, An appropriate order will be issued.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
Last modified: May 25, 2011