The Connell Business Company, et al. - Page 7

                                        - 7 -                                         
          because of anthrax contamination in the U.S. Postal Service,4 and           
          the petitions did not reach the Tax Court until December 5, 2001.           
          The Tax Court served the petitions on respondent on December 6,             
          2001.  Before receiving service of the petitions, respondent                
          assessed the deficiencies and penalties determined in the notices           
          of deficiency and notified petitioners and the petitioner trusts            
          of the assessments.  After receiving service of the petitions,              
          respondent promptly abated most of the assessments.5  Letters               
          dated September 16, 2002, were sent to petitioners and the                  
          petitioner trusts notifying them of the abatements.                         
               The parties have stipulated that the petitioner trusts are             
          to be disregarded for Federal income tax purposes and that the              
          income reported on the petitioner trusts’ returns is income of              
          petitioners and should have been reported on their individual               
          returns.6                                                                   
               Petitioners concede that they should have reported                     
          additional gross income of $56,272 and $72,587 in their returns             





               4 See, e.g., Gibson v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2002-218.              
               5 While all of the assessments of the deficiencies against             
          petitioners for 1995, 1996, and 1997 were abated, respondent                
          failed to abate $1.09 of the assessment with respect to The                 
          Connell Business Co. for 1997.                                              
               6 As a result, respondent has conceded the deficiencies                
          determined with respect to the petitioner trusts.                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011