Donald R. Cooley and Cathy A. Cooley - Page 10

                                       - 10 -                                         
         petitioner Cathy A. Cooley’s tax liabilities.                                
               On March 9, 2000, respondent issued to petitioners a Final             
         Notice of Intent to Levy and Notice of Your Right to A Hearing,              
         for their 1991 taxable year.  The account summary in the final               
         notice indicated that respondent was trying to collect an                    
         assessed balance of $2,493.93 and additional penalties and                   
         interest of $1,084.03 for a total of $3,577.96.                              
               On March 23, 2000, petitioners filed a Request for a                   
         Collection Due Process Hearing, relating to the final notice for             
         their 1991 taxable year.  In a letter attached to their request              
         for a section 6330 hearing, petitioners contended that the period            
         of limitations under section 6501(a) had expired, that respondent            
         had not issued them a notice of deficiency, and that the amount              
         of their tax liability had not been determined.                              
               On July 5, 2000, petitioners petitioned this Court with                
         respect to the April 4, 2000, notice of deficiency.  That case               
         was filed as docket No. 7464-00.                                             
               On August 8, 2000, petitioners were sent a Notice of                   
         Determination Concerning Collection Action(s) Under Section 6320             
         and/or 6330 for their 1989, 1990, 1992, 1993, and 1996 taxable               
         years.  The notice of determination provided:  “Our decision is              
         that the proposed levy action on 1989, 1990, 1992, 1993, and 1996            
         was appropriate.”  The notice of determination further indicated             
         that “These outstanding balances owed are from your voluntarily              






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011