- 3 - scheduled for February 28, 2002, at the Appeals Office in Washington, D.C. In response to petitioner’s request for collection alternatives, Settlement Officer Craca asked petitioner to submit income tax returns for taxable years 1997 through 2000 and “A completed Offer in Compromise package for consideration.” At petitioner’s request, the hearing originally scheduled for February 28, 2002, was continued so as to provide petitioner an opportunity to prepare and file the requested documents. In March 2002, petitioner filed the requested income tax returns, but he did not file an offer in compromise. In a letter dated June 12, 2002, respondent informed petitioner that his case was being transferred to the Appeals Office in Houston, Texas (Houston Appeals Office), and that a new Appeals officer would be assigned his case. The Houston Appeals Office, in a letter dated July 17, 2002, requested that petitioner file an income tax return for the 2001 taxable year and a form concomitant to an offer in compromise. A hearing under section 6330 was scheduled for August 14, 2002, with said hearing to be conducted via telephone. Petitioner did not submit to the Houston Appeals Office either an offer in compromise or the requested tax return for 2001. He instead objected to having his case transferred, because he wanted a face to face hearing under section 6330.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011