- 9 -
did not abuse his discretion with respect to any of the matters
in issue.
For the reasons discussed above, respondent’s determination
to proceed by levy with the collection of petitioner’s
outstanding liabilities for 1995 and 1996 should be sustained,
and we so hold. We have considered all of petitioner’s arguments
and contentions that are not discussed herein relating to whether
respondent may proceed with collection with respect to
petitioner’s outstanding liabilities for 1995 and 1996, and we
find those arguments and contentions to be without merit and/or
irrelevant.
To reflect the foregoing,
Decision will be entered
for respondent.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Last modified: May 25, 2011