Quentin Paul DeFore - Page 4

                                        - 3 -                                         
          return.  This omitted income consisted of two information returns           
          filed by third-party payors evidencing payments of nonemployee              
          compensation to Ms. DeFore during the year 2001.  One of the                
          information returns was for payments by TJR Partnership in the              
          amount of $4,642, and the other information return was for                  
          payments by S G, Inc., in the amount of $5,235.                             
               Petitioner filed a timely petition in this Court.  Ms.                 
          DeFore has not petitioned this Court.  Petitioner’s sole position           
          is that he is entitled to relief from joint liability under                 
          section 6015.  After the petition was filed, petitioner filed               
          with the Internal Revenue Service Form 8857, Request for Innocent           
          Spouse Relief.  There is no indication in the record that                   
          respondent acted on this request.  Respondent, pursuant to Rule             
          325 and King v. Commissioner, 115 T.C. 118 (2000), served notice            
          of this proceeding on Ms. DeFore; however, Ms. DeFore has not               
          intervened in this case, nor did she testify at the trial.                  
               Petitioner was married to Ms. DeFore from 1993 until 2002.             
          Both are natives of Texas, and they resided in Texas during their           
          marriage.  Petitioner was a pipe fitter and had been employed as            
          such since 1987.  Prior thereto, petitioner attended 2 years of             
          community college in Alvin, Texas, where he studied courses such            
          as mechanical drafting, agriculture, and real estate.  Although             
          he took the real estate examination, petitioner has never been              
          employed in that capacity or in any of the fields he studied in             






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011