Louise Demirjian - Page 14

                                       - 14 -                                         
          6015(f).  Washington v. Commissioner, supra at 146; Jonson v.               
          Commissioner, supra at 125.                                                 
               As directed by section 6015(f), respondent has prescribed              
          procedures to use in determining whether a relief-seeking spouse            
          qualifies for relief under that subsection.  At the time that               
          respondent issued his notice of determination to petitioner,                
          those procedures were found in Rev. Proc. 2000-15, 2000-1 C.B.              
          447.  This Court has upheld the use of these procedures in                  
          reviewing a negative determination.  See, e.g., Washington v.               
          Commissioner, supra at 147-152; Jonson v. Commissioner, supra at            
          125-126.                                                                    
               Rev. Proc. 2000-15, sec. 4.01, 2000-1 C.B. at 448, lists               
          seven threshold conditions that must be satisfied before                    
          respondent will consider a request for relief under section                 
          6015(f).  Respondent conceded that petitioner has met those seven           
          threshold conditions.  If the threshold conditions are satisfied,           
          Rev. Proc. 2000-15, sec. 4.02, 2000-1 C.B. at 448, lists                    
          circumstances where relief will generally be granted in cases               
          where a liability reported on a joint return is unpaid.  We have            
          considered the circumstances listed in Rev. Proc. 2000-15, sec.             
          4.02, 2000-1 C.B. at 448, in cases where the liability reported             
          on a joint return was unpaid.  See, e.g., August v. Commissioner,           
          T.C. Memo. 2002-201; Collier v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2002-              
          144; Castle v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2002-142.  We have                  






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011