Margaret A. Durham - Page 2

                                        - 2 -                                         
          relief under section 6015(b) or (c); and (2) whether respondent             
          abused his discretion in denying petitioner’s request for                   
          equitable relief under section 6015(f).                                     
                                     Background                                       
               Some of the facts have been stipulated, and the stipulated             
          facts are incorporated in our findings by this reference.                   
          Petitioner resided in Hope Mills, North Carolina, at the time she           
          filed the petition herein.                                                  
               Petitioner was married to James L. Hyatt (Mr. Hyatt).                  
          During the 1993 taxable year, petitioner was a housewife, and Mr.           
          Hyatt was a self-employed carpenter and partner of J.D. Trim                
          Company.                                                                    
               Petitioner and Mr. Hyatt filed a timely Federal income tax             
          return for the 1993 taxable year (1993 joint return).  The 1993             
          joint return reported “total tax” of $4,175 and tax due of the              
          same amount.  Petitioner and Mr. Hyatt did not remit any payment            
          with their return.  On May 23, 1994, respondent accepted the 1993           
          joint tax return as filed and assessed the tax reported therein,            
          along with additions to tax under sections 6651(a)(2) and 6654 of           
          $39.70 and $166.34, respectively, and interest of $29.03.                   
               Petitioner had overpayments of tax for the taxable years               
          1995 through 2001.  Respondent applied these overpayments to                
          offset the outstanding tax liability associated with the 1993               
          joint return in the following manner:                                       






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011