Margaret A. Durham - Page 6

                                        - 6 -                                         
          which is shown on the return, reduced by any rebate (within the             
          meaning of section 6211(b)(2)).  Secs. 6015(b)(3), 6662(d)(2)(A).           
               Section 6015(c) allows a taxpayer who is eligible and so               
          elects to limit his or her liability to the portion of a                    
          deficiency that is properly allocable to the taxpayer as provided           
          in section 6015(d).  Sec. 6015(c)(1).                                       
               In the present case, there is neither an understatement of             
          tax, as required under section 6015(b), nor a deficiency, as                
          required under section 6015(c).  Rather, there is an underpayment           
          of tax.  The 1993 return filed by petitioner and Mr. Hyatt                  
          reported tax due of $4,175, but they did not remit any payment              
          with their return.  Accordingly, section 6015(b) and (c) cannot             
          apply.  We sustain respondent’s determination that petitioner is            
          not entitled to relief from joint and several liability under               
          either section 6015(b) or (c).                                              
          2.  Section 6015(f)                                                         
               Since petitioner is not entitled to relief under section               
          6015(b) or (c), we consider whether petitioner qualifies for                
          relief under section 6015(f), after a trial de novo and using an            
          abuse of discretion standard.  See Ewing v. Commissioner, supra             
          at 43-44; Fernandez v. Commissioner, supra at 328-329; Butler v.            
          Commissioner, supra at 287-292.  Petitioner bears the burden of             
          proving that respondent’s denial of equitable relief under                  
          section 6015(f) was an abuse of discretion.  See Rule 142(a); Alt           






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011