Estate of Algerine Allen Smith, Deceased, James Allen Smith, Executor - Page 16

                                       - 16 -                                         
          Respondent acknowledges that excess underpayment interest which             
          has been assessed and paid by petitioner ‘becomes part of the               
          overpayment, i.e., a payment in excess of that which is properly            
          due.’”).12                                                                  


               12The Chief Counsel’s National Office addressed the meaning            
          of the term “overpayment” and our overpayment jurisdiction to               
          determine underpayment interest in field service advice:                    
                    The [Tax] Court does have jurisdiction to consider                
               alleged overpayments of underpayment interest as part                  
               of its overpayment jurisdiction.  Such excessive                       
               interest, once assessed and paid, becomes part of an                   
               overpayment, i.e., a payment in excess of that which is                
               properly due.  Jones v. Liberty Glass Co., 332 U.S.                    
               524, 531 (1947); Baumgardner v. Commissioner, 85 T.C.                  
               445 (1985).  At the time of the overpayment, previous                  
               payments of tax and previous payments of interest merge                
               to become the refundable amount of the overpayment,                    
               regardless of their previous designation as tax or                     
               interest.  Baumgardner, at 457-58; see also section                    
               6601(e)(1); Alexander Proudfoot Co. v. United States,                  
               454 F.2d 1379, 1383 (1972) (“deficiency interest . . .                 
               has been deemed an integral part of the tax”); Barton                  
               v. Commissioner, 97 T.C. 548 (1991) (Tax Court has                     
               jurisdiction to consider overpayment of interest under                 
               former section 6621(c) even though it does not have                    
               jurisdiction over a proposed determination of yet-to-be                
               assessed and paid underpayment interest).                              
                         *    *    *    *    *    *    *                              
                    Thus, in Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. v. Commissioner,                 
               110 T.C. 291 (1998), the court held that it had                        
               jurisdiction to consider the effect of the Service’s                   
               failure to honor the taxpayer’s request that the                       
               Service credit overpayments of tax from other tax years                
               against the proposed liabilities before the court                      
               because such crediting would have reduced the amount of                
               underpayment interest due from the taxpayer on the                     
               deficiencies.  Critical to the Court’s exercise of                     
               jurisdiction was the taxpayer’s payment of the tax plus                
               the underpayment interest determined by the Service                    
                                                             (continued...)           




Page:  Previous  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011