- 5 - deductions on the Schedules A for 1997 and 1998. Further, before departing for such trips, Mr. Evan did not make any effort to determine whether the person with whom he desired to speak regarding job opportunities would be available. Petitioners did not own or operate a business during the years in issue and were not self-employed during that period. On October 23, 2000, respondent sent petitioners a notice of deficiency for 1997 and 1998, disallowing, inter alia, the itemized deductions for unreimbursed employee expenses and the Schedule C business expenses for 1997 and 1998. Respondent explained that the unreimbursed employee expenses “did not meet the requirements for allowable job-hunting expenses” and “it has not been established that these [Schedule C business expenses] were ordinary and necessary trade or business expenses or expended for the purpose designated.” On January 22, 2001, petitioners mailed a petition to the Court disputing the disallowances.1 On February 12, 2001, petitioners had a fire at their residence, resulting in damages of over $500,000. Although petitioners searched through the rubble to try to find the records for 1997 and 1998, none were found. Petitioners did not 1 In the notice of deficiency respondent also disallowed a portion of the medical expenses. Petitioners did not raise this issue in the petition, and we deem it conceded. See Rule 34(b)(4).Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011