- 19 - supra. The reasoning of those courts is equally applicable here. A. Attempted Deduction of Personal Consumption Expenses After attending the NTS seminars, petitioners thought that once they had conveyed their personal assets, like cars and residences, to the OMK trusts, the trusts could deduct personal consumption expenses such as fire insurance, utilities, and repair and maintenance--indeed, almost everything except the costs of food consumed at home. “It is fundamental to our income tax regime that personal consumption expenditures--food, clothing, travel, education, entertainment--do not generate income tax deductions unless they are somehow inextricably linked to the production of income.” Schulz v. Commissioner, supra at 492-493. Personal expenses do not become deductible expenses of trust administration merely because title to property is placed in the trust. Id. There must be a nexus between the expense and the business conducted by the trust to qualify for a tax deduction. Conversely, legitimate expenses of a taxpayer’s business are deductible regardless of whether the taxpayer is an individual or a trust. United States v. Buttorff, 761 F.2d 1056, 1060 (5th Cir. 1985). The OMK trusts did not engage in any trade or business. Thus, the claimed deductions are not deductible under section 162. Transferring property into the trusts did not aid in the production of income, nor did it alter management activity.Page: Previous 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011