- 22 - Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1987-453, affd. 865 F.2d 1221 (11th Cir. 1989). The “ultimate direction and control” rested in petitioners, not in the OMK Company Trust. Indeed, it would be unrealistic to assume that anyone would transfer his or her lifetime services to a family trust without having such control. Borchert v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1982-379. Moreover, such a purported conveyance of lifetime services would be unenforceable and essentially nugatory under applicable State law in at least the vast majority of instances. United States v. Buttorff, supra at 1061. Petitioners were the sole source of the OMK Company Trust’s earned income and should be taxed on the income they generated from their services. Cf. Vercio v. Commissioner, supra at 1254. In such circumstances, the conveyance was merely an anticipatory assignment of income and was insufficient to shift the incidence of taxation from petitioners to the OMK trusts. We therefore hold that the income earned by petitioners through their services should be taxed to them. C. Grantor Trusts Petitioners transferred more than their earning abilities to the OMK trusts. They also transferred all of their personal and income producing property to the trusts. Different rules apply to gifts of income-producing property to trusts. Courts havePage: Previous 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011