- 30 - II. Petitioners Did Not Receive Income From Tamarisk and Fountainhead Respondent determined that petitioners failed to include $168,868 of interest in their 1998 income. The notice of deficiency issued to petitioners does not identify the sources of the interest. The explanation of items states that interest income reported on Form 1099-INT was not reported on petitioners’ return. The explanation also states that interest on bank deposits, coupons payable on bonds, loans, etc., is taxed to a cash basis taxpayer when credited or due. On brief, respondent asserts that $29,481 of interest from Fountainhead reported by the OMK Company Trust and $139,326 shown as interest on the November 19, 1998, Tamarisk statement but not reported on any return should be included in petitioners’ income.11 Respondent contends that those amounts represent “accessions to wealth, clearly realized, and over which the taxpayers have complete dominion”. We disagree. Not only were petitioners misled by the principals and agents of NTS with respect to the legal effect and benefits of establishing the OMK trusts; they were defrauded by Little, Fritts, and Rouse with respect to the investments in Fountainhead and the Tamarisk loan program, a.k.a, “cash for titles”. The 11The record is silent with respect to the remaining $61 of interest reported on the return of the OMK Family Trust that respondent determined in the notice of deficiency is taxable to petitioners.Page: Previous 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011