Orneal and Martha Kooyers, et al. - Page 34

                                       - 34 -                                         
          payments represented a return of petitioners’ investment and are            
          not includable income as interest simply because the payments               
          were reported as interest on statements of the investment                   
          accounts.  Cf. Burnet v. Logan, 283 U.S. 404 (1931).                        
               Petitioners have not addressed or provided any information             
          regarding the remaining $61 of interest reported on the return of           
          the OMK Family Trust that respondent determined in the notice of            
          deficiency was taxable to petitioners.  Respondent’s                        
          determination in the notice of deficiency is presumptively                  
          correct, and petitioners have the burden of proving that no part            
          of the amounts received constituted interest or was otherwise not           
          taxable to them.  Rule 142(a); Welch v. Helvering, 290 U.S. 111             
          (1933).  Section 7491(a)(1) does not shift the burden of proof to           
          respondent.  Consequently, $61 of interest determined in the                
          notice of deficiency is to be included in petitioners’ income.              
          III. Petitioners Had Additional Capital Gain of $103,791 From the           
               Sale of Mutual Fund Shares                                             
               Respondent also determined that petitioners had $123,791 of            
          unreported capital gain.  The explanation in the notice of                  
          deficiency issued to petitioners stated that petitioners’ capital           
          gain was increased because the OMK trusts are disregarded for               


               12(...continued)                                                       
          T.C. Memo. 1993-393, affd. without published opinion 72 F.3d 135            
          (9th Cir. 1995); see also Premji v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo.                
          1996-304, affd. 139 F.3d 912 (10th Cir. 1998).                              






Page:  Previous  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011