- 35 - income tax purposes. The explanation further stated that the bases are valued at the original purchase prices and the step-up in bases given the assets at the time of transfer is not allowed. On brief, respondent clarifies that the basis in each of the Scudder funds is $15,000 rather than the amounts reported on the OMK Company Trust return. Consequently, respondent contends that the correct amount of the capital gain includable in petitioners’ income is $103,791, computed as follows: Sale Gain Fund Price Basis (Loss) Scudder funds Latin $47,755 $15,000 $32,755 Growth 32,719 15,000 17,719 Investment 64,239 15,000 49,239 Other funds L.A. small cap 27,387 28,194 (807) L.A. small cap 28,597 30,012 (1,415) J. Hancock 16,052 16,142 (90) Pilgrim 15,333 16,137 (804) L.A. class A 32,186 24,992 7,194 Total $264,268 $160,477 $103,791 Petitioners do not challenge respondent’s revised computation of the capital gain. We hold, therefore, that petitioners’ income should include $103,791 of capital gain. IV. Petitioners Failed To Substantiate Expenses Claimed as Business Expenses of the OMK Trusts Because the OMK trusts are disregarded, petitioners may be entitled to deduct expenses claimed by the trusts provided thePage: Previous 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011