Gerald L. and Jessica P. Frey - Page 22

                                       - 22 -                                         
               in the part of the Service in sending you the proper                   
               notices of an outstanding liability.  The records                      
               indicated that notices were issued for all of the years                
               reflecting a balance due and asking you either pay in                  
               full or call the IRS to discuss payment arrangements.                  
               To date, no agreement has been instituted.                             
               The underlying liability appears to be correct.  The                   
               assessments were based on your income and withholdings.                
               You have not pointed to any errors and you have been                   
               unwilling to discuss collection alternatives which                     
               include full payment, monthly payment, offer in                        
               compromise etc.                                                        
               Please respond within 2 weeks of the date of this                      
               letter if you have valid issues or want to propose a                   
               payment resolution.  If I do not receive a timely                      
               response, I will proceed with the issuance of a                        
               decision letter that will sustain the levy action.                     
               On November 27, 2002, the IRS Team Manager for Area 2,                 
          General Appeals, wrote a letter to petitioners.  That letter                
          stated in pertinent part:                                                   
               This is in response to your letter dated November 16,                  
               2002 that was addressed to this office.  I apologize                   
               for not responding earlier but I have been away from                   
               the office.                                                            
               In your letter you are concerned about the fact that                   
               the Settlement Officer who met with you considered more                
               than one year (return) at the meeting and that she                     
               asked about subsequent filings of Federal tax returns.                 
               You also ask that this matter be reassigned.  There is                 
               nothing wrong with the Settlement Officer’s handling of                
               either of these items.  I, therefore, will not reassign                
               this matter to another Appeals or Settlement Officer.                  
               There is nothing wrong with the Settlement Officer                     
               considering all of the tax periods before Appeals at                   
               one hearing.  In addition, taxpayers must be current in                
               the filing of their Federal tax returns before we can                  
               offer collection alternatives to help them.  Thus, the                 
               Settlement Officer was merely asking about subsequent                  
               filings to see if she could offer collection                           
               alternatives to you for the amounts owed in the periods                





Page:  Previous  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011