Laura A. Gavigan - Page 13

                                       - 12 -                                         
          raising the underlying tax liability as an issue.  Sec.                     
          6330(c)(2)(B).                                                              
               Petitioner claims that she was denied her right to raise               
          relevant issues.  The administrative record does not support her            
          claims.  Although petitioner received a statutory notice of                 
          deficiency for 1996, she was permitted to discuss her underlying            
          liability at her CDP hearing.  She continued to make frivolous              
          arguments about the legality of Federal income taxes, and she               
          refused to discuss alternatives to the collection of her unpaid             
          tax liability.  Accordingly, there was no abuse of discretion in            
          regard to whether petitioner was allowed to raise relevant issues           
          at her CDP hearing.                                                         
          Section 6673 Penalty                                                        
               Section 6673(a)(1) authorizes the Court to require a                   
          taxpayer to pay a penalty not to exceed $25,000 if the taxpayer             
          took frivolous positions in the proceedings or instituted the               
          proceedings primarily for delay.  A position maintained by the              
          taxpayer is “frivolous” where it is “contrary to established law            
          and unsupported by a reasoned, colorable argument for change in             
          the law.”  Coleman v. Commissioner, 791 F.2d 68, 71 (7th Cir.               
          1986); Gilligan v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2004-194.  We have              
          consistently imposed section 6673 penalties in lien and levy                
          review cases where the taxpayer has raised frivolous and                    
          groundless arguments as to the validity of our Federal income tax           






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011