- 13 - system. See Hamzik v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2004-223; Gilligan v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2004-194. In the present case, respondent requested that the Court impose a penalty pursuant to section 6673(a)(1). By taking frivolous and groundless positions regarding the Federal income tax system, some of which have been summarized above, petitioner abused the protections afforded under section 6330. Petitioner was warned by the Appeals Office that sanctions could result if she continued to make frivolous and groundless arguments. Petitioner continued to do so, and in petitioning this Court for review, she has wasted the limited resources of this Court. Accordingly, we shall impose a penalty pursuant to section 6673(a)(1) in the amount of $2,000. On the record before us, we shall grant respondent’s motion. Reviewed and adopted as the report of the Small Tax Case Division. To reflect the foregoing, An order granting respondent’s motion and decision for respondent will be entered.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Last modified: May 25, 2011