Greg William Gouveia, a.k.a. Greg W. Gouveia, a.k.a. Greg Gouveia & Carol Ann Gorveia, a.k.a. Carol Gouveia, et al. - Page 30

                                       - 30 -                                         
          II. Statute of Limitations24                                                
               Section 6501(a) provides that the amount of any tax imposed            
          shall be assessed within 3 years after the return was filed.                
          However, if the taxpayer omits from gross income an amount                  
          properly includable that is in excess of 25 percent of the gross            
          income reported on the return, the tax may be assessed within 6             
          years from the date the return was filed.  Sec. 6501(e)(1)(A).              
          Any amount that is omitted from gross income but is “disclosed in           
          the return, or in a statement attached to the return, in a manner           
          adequate to apprise the Secretary of the nature and amount of               
          such item”, shall not be taken into account for purposes of                 
          computing the amount of gross income omitted from the return.               
          Sec. 6501(e)(1)(A)(ii).  In applying section 6501(e)(1)(A)(ii),             
          we must consider whether an adjustment to the taxpayer’s gross              
          income might be apparent from the face of the return to the                 
          “reasonable man”.  Univ. Country Club, Inc. v. Commissioner, 64             
          T.C. 460, 471 (1975).  Although section 6501(e)(1)(A)(ii) does              
          not require that the return disclose the exact amount of the                

               24As a preliminary matter, we note that the Gouveias did not           
          raise the statute of limitations as a defense in their pleadings,           
          as required by Rule 39.  However, we granted respondent leave to            
          file an amendment to answer that addressed the statute of                   
          limitations issue.  Subsequently, both parties discussed the                
          issue in their pretrial memoranda and on brief.  Under these                
          circumstances, we consider the issue to have been tried by                  
          consent of the parties.  Rule 41(b)(1); LeFever v. Commissioner,            
          103 T.C. 525, 538 (1994), affd. 100 F.3d 778 (10th Cir. 1996);              
          Anderson v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1993-288, affd. without                
          published opinion 36 F.3d 1091 (4th Cir. 1994).                             





Page:  Previous  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011