- 9 - “credible evidence” to support their personal deductions of the real property tax payments at issue. [Id.6] The relevant legislative history provides that once a taxpayer has introduced credible evidence sufficient to place the burden of proof on the Commissioner: “If after evidence from both sides, the court believes that the evidence is equally balanced, the court shall find that the Secretary has not sustained his burden of proof.” H. Conf. Rept. 105-599, at 241 (1998), 1998-3 C.B. 747, 995. The record before us now is the same as was before us originally and as was before the Court of Appeals. The Court of Appeals has found petitioners’ evidence credible. Whatever adverse inferences we might draw from the evidence 6 In reaching this conclusion, the Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit did not expressly differentiate between Mr. Griffin’s direct and cross-examination testimony. In the absence of any contrary indication, we assume that the Court of Appeals considered both Mr. Griffin’s direct and cross-examination testimony. We do not construe the opinion of the Court of Appeals as standing for the proposition that, in assessing the credibility of evidence for purposes of deciding the placement of the burden of proof pursuant to sec. 7491(a)(1), the trial court is required to accept at face value self-serving testimony which it finds unworthy of belief. See, e.g., Day v. Commissioner, 975 F.2d 534, 538 (8th Cir. 1992) (stating that “The Tax Court is not required to give credence to the self-serving testimony of interested parties.”), affg. in part, revg. in part and remanding T.C. Memo. 1991-140. As stated in the relevant legislative history of sec. 7491: “The introduction of evidence will not meet this standard [of credible evidence] if the court is not convinced that it is worthy of belief.” H. Conf. Rept. 105-599, at 241 (1998), 1998-3 C.B. 747, 995; cf. Kincade v. Mikles, 144 F.2d 784, 787 (8th Cir. 1944) (“As to the contention that the evidence is unworthy of belief, it need only be said that it was the function of the trial court to pass upon the credibility of the witnesses and the weight to be given their testimony.”).Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011