Robert Griffin and Julia Griffin - Page 9

                                        - 9 -                                         
               “credible evidence” to support their personal                          
               deductions of the real property tax payments                           
               at issue.  [Id.6]                                                      
               The relevant legislative history provides that once a                  
          taxpayer has introduced credible evidence sufficient to place the           
          burden of proof on the Commissioner: “If after evidence from both           
          sides, the court believes that the evidence is equally balanced,            
          the court shall find that the Secretary has not sustained his               
          burden of proof.”  H. Conf. Rept. 105-599, at 241 (1998), 1998-3            
          C.B. 747, 995.  The record before us now is the same as was                 
          before us originally and as was before the Court of Appeals.  The           
          Court of Appeals has found petitioners’ evidence credible.                  
          Whatever adverse inferences we might draw from the evidence                 

               6 In reaching this conclusion, the Court of Appeals for the            
          Eighth Circuit did not expressly differentiate between Mr.                  
          Griffin’s direct and cross-examination testimony.  In the absence           
          of any contrary indication, we assume that the Court of Appeals             
          considered both Mr. Griffin’s direct and cross-examination                  
          testimony.                                                                  
               We do not construe the opinion of the Court of Appeals as              
          standing for the proposition that, in assessing the credibility             
          of evidence for purposes of deciding the placement of the burden            
          of proof pursuant to sec. 7491(a)(1), the trial court is required           
          to accept at face value self-serving testimony which it finds               
          unworthy of belief.  See, e.g., Day v. Commissioner, 975 F.2d               
          534, 538 (8th Cir. 1992) (stating that “The Tax Court is not                
          required to give credence to the self-serving testimony of                  
          interested parties.”), affg. in part, revg. in part and remanding           
          T.C. Memo. 1991-140.  As stated in the relevant legislative                 
          history of sec. 7491:  “The introduction of evidence will not               
          meet this standard [of credible evidence] if the court is not               
          convinced that it is worthy of belief.”  H. Conf. Rept. 105-599,            
          at 241 (1998), 1998-3 C.B. 747, 995; cf. Kincade v. Mikles, 144             
          F.2d 784, 787 (8th Cir. 1944) (“As to the contention that the               
          evidence is unworthy of belief, it need only be said that it was            
          the function of the trial court to pass upon the credibility of             
          the witnesses and the weight to be given their testimony.”).                




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011