- 4 - Before the payment due date, Mr. Renbarger offered to compromise the estate’s Federal estate tax liability of $4,267,373 with respondent for $2,166,000. Respondent initially rejected the offer in compromise (OIC).3 Mr. Renbarger appealed and respondent requested additional information to support the OIC. Respondent finally denied Mr. Renbarger’s appeal of his rejection of the OIC, determining that collecting an amount larger than the estate’s OIC would not create an economic hardship. Mr. Renbarger planned to pay the Federal estate tax by selecting five real properties to advertise for sale without the assistance of a realty company.4 Mr. Renbarger’s asking price for one property was more than three times the value at which it was reported on the estate’s Federal estate tax return. By the payment due date, none of the advertised properties was sold or contracted to be sold. Mr. Renbarger sold only one property before the payment due date. The amount received, $1,572,276, was escrowed for 3More specifically, respondent rejected the estate’s OIC because respondent’s examination showed that: (1) Respondent could collect a larger amount than the estate offered; (2) no exceptional circumstance existed; and (3) the estate failed to establish that an economic hardship would be created by liquidating enough assets to pay the Federal estate tax in full. 4On Jan. 16, 2003, almost 2 years after the payment due date, the estate hired a professional realty company to advertise and sell three of its properties.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011