Maurice E. John, Jr. and Jan E. John - Page 2

                                        - 2 -                                         
          $491,054 as a business bad debt deduction under section 1661 in             
          1995.  We hold they are not.                                                
                                  FINDINGS OF FACT                                    
               Some of the facts have been stipulated and are so found.               
          The stipulation of facts and the accompanying exhibits are                  
          incorporated by this reference.  Petitioners resided in                     
          Louisville, Kentucky, at the time they filed the petition.                  
          Petitioner                                                                  
               Maurice E. John, Jr. (petitioner), is an eye surgeon and               
          ophthalmologist who has continuously engaged in the practice of             
          medicine since 1975.  Since 1981, petitioner has provided medical           
          services as a full-time employee of John Eye Clinic, Inc. (the              
          Clinic), a professional corporation incorporated in                         
          Jeffersonville, Indiana.  Petitioner was, at nearly all times,              
          the 100-percent shareholder of the Clinic.                                  
          Evans                                                                       
               Petitioner hired John Evans (Evans) in 1987 to serve as the            
          Clinic’s business manager.  Petitioner chose Evans from a pool of           
          candidates because “he was by far the most impressive and best              
          candidate.”  Throughout their acquaintance, petitioner was highly           
          impressed with Evans’ performance and abilities, describing him             
          as “incredibly bright” and one of the “smartest people [he had]             
          ever met”.  Petitioner felt that Evans “was an asset to the                 


               1All section references are to the Internal Revenue Code in            
          effect for the year at issue, unless otherwise indicated, and all           
          Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and                  
          Procedure.                                                                  




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011