Maurice E. John, Jr. and Jan E. John - Page 12

                                       - 12 -                                         
          insufficient).  We therefore find that petitioners have failed to           
          meet their burden of proving the loan became wholly worthless in            
          1995.                                                                       
          Failure To Take Reasonable Steps To Collect                                 
               Next we address whether petitioner took reasonable steps to            
          enforce repayment of the debt.  In the absence of reasonable                
          steps to enforce its collection, a debt generally is not regarded           
          as wholly worthless unless there is proof that steps to collect             
          it would be futile.  Perry v. Commissioner, 22 T.C. 968, 974                
          (1954); see also Newman v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1982-61                 
          (taxpayer must have exhausted all usual and reasonable means of             
          collecting a debt before worthlessness can be found).                       
               There is no evidence that petitioner took any affirmative              
          steps, other than the Lawsuit, to enforce collection of amounts             
          owed him by Evans.  For instance, petitioner testified that he              
          would have made a “sweetheart deal” for Evans to repay the loans            
          over 20 or 30 years, or “whatever time it took”.  Yet the record            
          is devoid of evidence that petitioner ever made Evans that offer.           
               The only obvious step petitioner took was the Lawsuit.  By             
          petitioner’s own admission, however, he commenced the Lawsuit               
          primarily to subject Evans to the noncompete agreement, not to              
          enforce collection of the debt.  Moreover, petitioner instituted            
          the Lawsuit in 1996, not 1995, the year in which petitioner took            
          the bad debt deduction.  A bad debt is deductible only in the               
          year it becomes worthless and, hence, petitioner’s suit in 1996             
          does not render the debt worthless in 1995.  Denver & Rio Grande            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011