Estate of David Katz, Deceased, Sarah Katz, Executrix - Page 9

                                        - 9 -                                         
          equivalent”, as required by decedent’s will.  Thus, the estate’s            
          argument regarding decedent’s intent is irrelevant, since it was            
          defeated by the Disclaimer, and not the will provisions.                    
               We have considered all of the contentions and arguments of             
          the parties that are not discussed herein, and we find them to be           
          without merit, irrelevant, or moot.                                         
               To reflect the foregoing,                                              

                                                   Decision will be entered           
                                              for respondent.                         






























Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  

Last modified: May 25, 2011