- 17 - to fulfill a duty of inquiry. The Court concludes that this factor favors petitioner. 7. Whether the Underpayment of Tax Is Attributable to Petitioner's Husband Respondent concedes that the underpayment of tax for 1996 is attributable to Mr. Keitz. The Court concludes that this factor favors petitioner. 8. Legal Obligation To Pay Tax During the evaluation process, respondent's examiner determined that Mr. Keitz bears the legal obligation for the tax liability. As neither party has introduced any additional evidence on this point, the Court accepts this determination and concludes that this factor favors petitioner. 9. Conclusion Petitioner has presented a strong case for relief from joint liability under the factors promulgated by the Commissioner in Rev. Proc. 2000-15, supra. All of the factors except one, economic hardship, either weigh in favor of petitioner or are neutral. While the economic hardship factor weighs against petitioner, it does not outweigh the positive and neutral factors. Rev. Proc. 2000-15, sec. 4.03(2). Petitioner is no longer married to Mr. Keitz. She did not significantly benefit from the underpayment, the underpayment was solely attributable to Mr. Keitz, petitioner has complied withPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011