Benjamin C. Kent - Page 8

                                        - 7 -                                         
          expenses in the general location of the new job.  H. Conf. Rept.            
          103-213, at 592 (1993), 1993-3 C.B. 393, 470.  The term “moving             
          expenses” means only the reasonable expenses of moving household            
          goods and personal effects from the former residence to the new             
          residence and of traveling (including lodging) from the former              
          residence to the new place of residence.  Sec. 217(b)(1).                   
               To qualify for the deduction, the taxpayer must satisfy the            
          conditions regarding both distance to the taxpayer’s new                    
          principal place of work as set forth in section 217(c)(1) and               
          duration of full-time employment as set forth in section                    
          217(c)(2).  The condition of section 217(c)(2) shall not apply              
          “if the taxpayer is unable to satisfy such condition by reason of           
          * * * involuntary separation (other than for willful misconduct)            
          from the service of, or transfer for the benefit of, an employer            
          after obtaining full-time employment in which the taxpayer could            
          reasonably have been expected to satisfy such condition.”  Sec.             
          217(d)(1)(B).                                                               
               If claimed deductions are not adequately substantiated, we             
          may estimate them, provided we are convinced that the taxpayer              
          incurred such expenses and we have a basis upon which to make an            
          estimate.  Cohan v. Commissioner, 39 F.2d 540 (2d Cir. 1930);               
          Vanicek v. Commissioner, 85 T.C. 731, 743 (1985).  Without such a           
          basis, any allowance would amount to unguided largesse.  Williams           
          v. United States, 245 F.2d 559, 560 (5th Cir. 1957).                        






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011