- 14 - entitled to such loss. Petitioner also filed as a head of household for 1999 and 2000 when he was married to Mrs. Eastman- Kent. Petitioner has not shown that he acted in good faith in claiming these amounts. Respondent has met his burden of production under section 7491(c). We conclude that petitioner’s actions were not those of a reasonable and prudent person under the circumstances. Thus, we sustain respondent on this adjustment. Reviewed and adopted as the report of the Small Tax Case Division. To reflect the foregoing, Decision will be entered under Rule 155.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Last modified: May 25, 2011