Nick Kikalos and Helen Kikalos - Page 20

                                       - 20 -                                         
          failure to make a reasonable attempt to comply with the Internal            
          Revenue Code including a careless, reckless, or intentional                 
          disregard of the Code.                                                      
               Section 7491(c) applies to examinations which commence after           
          July 22, 1998.  Pursuant to this section, respondent has the                
          burden of production with respect to the liability of any                   
          individual for any penalty or addition to tax.  See sec. 7491(c).           
          “[F]or the Commissioner to meet his burden of production, the               
          Commissioner must come forward with sufficient evidence                     
          indicating that it is appropriate to impose the relevant                    
          penalty.”  Higbee v. Commissioner, 116 T.C. 438, 446 (2001).  In            
          Higbee, we found that respondent met his burden of production for           
          the negligence penalty by showing that petitioners failed to keep           
          adequate books and records or to substantiate properly the items            
          in question.  Id. at 449.  Consequently, we conclude that                   
          respondent has met his burden of production for his determination           
          of the accuracy-related penalty based on negligence or disregard            
          of rules or regulations.                                                    
               Pursuant to section 6662(c), negligence includes any failure           
          by a taxpayer to keep adequate books or records.  See sec.                  
          1.6662-3(b), Income Tax Regs.  For the purposes of this section,            
          a taxpayer is negligent when he or she fails “to do what a                  
          reasonable and ordinarily prudent person would do under the                 
          circumstances.”  Korshin v. Commissioner, 91 F.3d 670, 672 (4th             






Page:  Previous  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011