Lionel D. Kolker - Page 7

                                        - 7 -                                         
                                     Discussion                                       
          A.  Section 6330                                                            
               Section 6330(a) provides that no levy may be made on any               
          property or right to property of any person unless the Secretary            
          has notified such person in writing of the right to a hearing               
          before the levy is made.  If the person makes a request for a               
          hearing, a hearing shall be held before an impartial officer or             
          employee of the IRS Office of Appeals.  Sec. 6330(b)(1), (3).  At           
          the hearing, a taxpayer may raise any relevant issue, including             
          appropriate spousal defenses, challenges to the appropriateness             
          of the collection action, and collection alternatives.  Sec.                
          6330(c)(2)(A).  Additionally, at the hearing, a taxpayer may                
          contest the existence or amount of the underlying tax liability             
          if the taxpayer did not receive a notice of deficiency for the              
          tax in question or did not otherwise have an earlier opportunity            
          to dispute the tax liability.  Sec. 6330(c)(2)(B); see also Sego            
          v. Commissioner, 114 T.C. 604, 609 (2000).                                  
               Following a hearing, the Appeals Office must make a                    
          determination whether the proposed levy action may proceed.  In             
          so doing, the Appeals Office is required to take into                       
          consideration the verification presented by the Secretary, the              
          issues raised by the taxpayer, and whether the proposed levy                
          action appropriately balances the need for efficient collection             
          of taxes with a taxpayer’s concerns regarding the intrusiveness             






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011