Thomas Henry Koppel - Page 3

                                        - 3 -                                         
          retained earnings for 2000 (retained earnings statement), at the            
          end of 2000, BCE had retained earnings in the amount of                     
          approximately $1.5 million.                                                 
               During May 2000, petitioner held BCE stock in his Charles              
          Schwab & Co., Inc. account No. 51933001 (Charles Schwab account).           
          On May 9, 2000, pursuant to the spinoff transaction, petitioner             
          received from BCE 471 shares of Nortel stock.  According to the             
          Form 1099-DIV, Dividends and Distributions, issued for the                  
          Charles Schwab account for 2000, the value of the Nortel stock              
          that petitioner received was $27,641.81.                                    
               On Schedule B, Interest and Ordinary Dividends, of                     
          petitioner’s 2000 Form 1040, U.S. Individual Income Tax Return,             
          petitioner reported total ordinary dividends from the Charles               
          Schwab account in the amount of $34,101.49.  Petitioner then                
          subtracted the full amount of the Nortel stock distribution and             
          made the following notation:  “LESS SPINOFF REPORTED AS ORDINARY            
          DIVIDEND (SEE EXHIBIT 1)”.  The attached “Exhibit 1” was a copy             
          of petitioner’s Charles Schwab account statement for May 1-31,              
          2000, which indicated petitioner’s receipt of the Nortel stock on           
          May 9, 2000.  On the statement, petitioner had drawn an arrow to            
          the Nortel stock transaction and written “NOT AN ORDINARY                   


               3(...continued)                                                        
          sec. 355.  Our use of the term “spinoff” does not mean the                  
          transaction qualified for nonrecognition treatment under sec.               
          355(a)(1).                                                                  





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011