Carolyn Lamb - Page 14

                                       - 13 -                                         
          contrast, she contends that she is entitled to a deduction for              
          the use of the Suburban.                                                    
               In the case of a passenger automobile, section 274(d)                  
          proscribes a deduction on the basis of any approximation or the             
          unsupported testimony of the taxpayer.  Sec. 274(d)(4), sec.                
          280F(d)(5).  The term “passenger automobile” is defined as any 4-           
          wheeled vehicle that is manufactured primarily for use on public            
          streets, roads, and highways and that is rated at 6,000 pounds              
          unloaded gross vehicle weight or less.  Sec. 280F(d)(5)(A).                 
          Although the term “passenger automobile” does not include any               
          truck or van under regulations promulgated by the Commissioner,             
          see sec. 280F(d)(5)(B), petitioner failed to demonstrate that the           
          Suburban comes within the definition of an excepted truck or van,           
          see sec. 1.280F-6T(c)(3)(iii), Temporary Income Tax Regs., 49               
          Fed. Reg. 42713 (Oct. 24, 1984); sec. 1.274-5T(k)(2), Temporary             
          Income Tax Regs., 50 Fed. Reg. 46033 (Nov. 6, 1985).                        
               Even if the stringent substantiation requirements of section           
          274(d) were not applicable, and even if we were to conclude that            
          petitioner incurred deductible expenses for the use of a vehicle            
          owned by another taxpayer, the record provides no basis                     
          whatsoever for us to estimate a reasonable allowance for the use            
          of the Suburban.  See Williams v. United States, 245 F.2d 559,              
          560 (5th Cir. 1957); Vanicek v. Commissioner, 85 T.C. 731, 743              
          (1985).                                                                     






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011