- 15 - At trial, petitioner testified that the amount in issue was paid to Michael Dean, and she produced a notarized statement signed by him to that effect. The statement, however, was conclusory and did not provide any details regarding the manner, mode or frequency of payment. Although petitioner admitted that she did not issue a Form 1099-Miscellaneous to Mr. Dean for 2000, we find that petitioner did incur contract labor expense in that year. The fact that petitioner was operating two distinct businesses necessarily required that she have some assistance. Although relatives might have provided their assistance on a volunteer basis, Mr. Dean did not fall into that category, and we doubt that he would have provided his services gratis. Based on the record as a whole, we hold that petitioner is entitled to a deduction for contract labor expense in the amount of $5,000. See Cohan v. Commissioner, supra. C. Conclusion Reviewed and adopted as the report of the Small Tax Case Division.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011