- 6 - to “Bristol” condition2 the fair market value of the Feadship would increase to $3.2 million, and that replacement of the Feadship purchased by petitioner with a brand new Feadship of the same size would cost petitioner $8.7 million. Like the first survey, however, this second survey was incomplete in that the Feadship was not removed from the water and the hull was not inspected. Also, the second survey did not reflect an estimate of the restoration costs of the Feadship to Bristol condition. As of the May 29, 1990, closing of petitioner’s purchase of the Feadship, petitioner still had neither inspected nor seen the Feadship. Also, petitioner was not present at the closing. To assist with his purchase of the Feadship, petitioner obtained a secured bank loan for $1 million. Petitioner paid the proceeds of this loan toward the purchase price of the Feadship. For a number of months after petitioner’s purchase, the Feadship remained in Florida in the control of Mogul at the facilities of Boats, Yachts & Ships. In July of 1990, petitioner was in Florida and saw the Feadship for the first time and realized that the interior and exterior of the Feadship were in extremely poor condition. Despite being aware of the condition of the Feadship, petitioner 2 Bristol condition refers to a yacht as being in very good condition, with the varnish, paint, engines, and general condition in a condition as good as or better than that of a first-class hotel.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011