- 6 - establishing fraud but must clearly and convincingly prove that petitioner intended to evade tax. Sec. 7454(a); Rule 142(b); Parks v. Commissioner, 94 T.C. 654, 660-661 (1990); Wright v. Commissioner, supra at 643-644. This burden is met where respondent proves conduct intended to conceal, mislead, or otherwise prevent the collection of tax. Parks v. Commissioner, supra at 661. Fraud is not to be imputed or presumed but rather must be established by some independent evidence. Beaver v. Commissioner, 55 T.C. 85, 92 (1970). Respondent has failed to meet his burden. Respondent’s witnesses either supported petitioner’s contentions or presented contradictory and unconvincing testimony. In addition, the typical indicia of an intent to evade tax are not present. Petitioner maintained adequate records, made all pertinent information available to his secretaries (i.e., who prepared records for Mr. Kisalus to use in preparing petitioner’s returns) and subsequently to the Internal Revenue Service, cooperated with the Internal Revenue Service’s investigation, and did not employ any scheme to conceal income. Petitioner and his secretaries recorded, in the handwritten ledger, the receipt of all customer checks (i.e., those cashed or deposited in his personal account). Mr. Kisalus, on whom petitioner relied, did not, however, use this ledger to prepare the Company’s returns.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011