Maureen Monsour - Page 22

                                        - 22 -                                        
          1993 of erroneous deductions with respect to Laurel Valley Farms,           
          the Three Crowns Hotel, Azure Tides, Inc., Georgetown Square, and           
          the Three Crowns Hotel Back Court.10  In the notice for the tax-            
          able years at issue, respondent also made determinations for one            
          or more of the taxable years 1989, 1991, 1992, and 1993 of                  
          (1) omitted income with respect to Georgetown Square, (2) omitted           
          interest income with respect to Monsour Medical Center, and                 
          (3) omitted income relating to unexplained deposits into (a) the            
          joint bank accounts of petitioner and Mr. Monsour, (b) a separate           
          bank account of petitioner (petitioner’s separate bank account),            
          and (c) a bank account that petitioner maintained with respect to           
          her law practice (petitioner’s law practice bank account).11  In            
          that notice, respondent also made determinations for one or more            


               10The record does not establish the respective amounts of              
          respondent’s determinations of erroneous deductions with respect            
          to Laurel Valley Farms, the Three Crowns Hotel, Azure Tides,                
          Inc., Georgetown Square, and the Three Crowns Hotel Back Court.             
          Nor does the record establish to which of the taxable years 1989,           
          1991, 1992, and 1993 those determinations pertain.                          
               11The record does not establish the respective amounts of              
          respondent’s determinations of omitted income with respect to               
          Georgetown Square, Monsour Medical Center, the joint bank ac-               
          counts of petitioner and Mr. Monsour, petitioner’s separate bank            
          account, and petitioner’s law practice bank account, although, as           
          discussed below, the record shows that respondent made a determi-           
          nation of omitted income relating to petitioner’s law practice              
          bank account in an amount between $8,000 and $10,000.  Nor does             
          the record establish to which of the taxable years 1989, 1991,              
          1992, and 1993 those determinations pertain, although, as dis-              
          cussed below, the record shows that respondent made a determina-            
          tion of omitted income relating to petitioner’s law practice bank           
          account for two of the three taxable years 1991, 1992, and 1993.            





Page:  Previous  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011