- 48 - C. Extrinsic Interpretive Aids 1. Use of the Term Elsewhere in the Section Besides appearing in section 6330(c)(2)(B), the term “underlying tax liability” appears in section 6330(d)(1).13 Section 6330(d)(1) provides: SEC. 6330(d)(1). Judicial Review of Determination. –- The person [the subject of a section 6330 determination] may, within 30 days of a determination under this section, appeal such determination -- (A) to the Tax Court (and the Tax Court shall have jurisdiction with respect to such matter); or (B) if the Tax Court does not have jurisdiction of the underlying tax liability, to a district court of the United States. We have interpreted section 6330(d)(1) to mean that we have jurisdiction in section 6330 cases involving the types of taxes, e.g., income, estate, and gift taxes, that we normally may consider, regardless of whether the section 6330 case in front of us involves a deficiency in such taxes. See Landry v. Commissioner, 116 T.C. 60, 62 (2001). Under that interpretation, the term “underlying tax liability” means “the type of tax at issue”.14 Neither petitioner nor respondent argues for that 13 As pertinent to this proceeding, both provisions originated with the addition of sec. 6330 to the Internal Revenue Code by the Internal Revenue Service Restructuring and Reform Act of 1998, Pub. L. 105-206, sec. 3401(b), 112 Stat. 747. 14 In Katz v. Commissioner, 115 T.C. 329, 339 (2000), we interpreted the term “underlying tax liability” in sec. 6330(d)(1)(B) as including “any amounts owed by a taxpayer (continued...)Page: Previous 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011