Glenn A. Mortensen - Page 16

                                       - 16 -                                         
          business credit from petitioner’s taxable year 1986.  While                 
          application of the credit purportedly would have resulted in the            
          elimination of petitioner’s regular tax liability in 1983, 1984,            
          and 1985, petitioner would have reported liability for                      
          alternative minimum tax of $855 in 1984 and $992 in 1985.                   
               By letter dated May 23, 1988, respondent notified petitioner           
          that SGE 84-2's taxable year 1987 was under review.  This letter            
          stated in relevant part:                                                    
               Our information indicates that you were a partner in the               
               above partnership during the above tax year.  Based upon our           
               review of the partnership’s tax shelter activities, we have            
               apprised the Tax Matters Partner that we believe the                   
               purported tax shelter deductions and/or credits are not                
               allowable and, if claimed, we plan to examine the return and           
               disallow the deductions and/or credits.  The Internal                  
               Revenue Code provides, in appropriate cases, for the                   
               application [of various penalties].                                    
          By similar letter dated May 9, 1989, respondent notified                    
          petitioner that another of his Hoyt partnerships, Timeshare                 
          Breeding Service (TBS), was under review with respect to its                
          taxable year 1988.                                                          
               In January 1992, respondent mailed Hoyt investors, including           
          petitioner, a letter regarding the application of section 469               
          (relating to passive activity loss limitations).  That same                 
          month, Mr. Hoyt mailed a letter to investors, including                     
          petitioner, setting forth arguments that Hoyt investors                     
          materially participated in their investments within the meaning             
          of section 469.  In this letter, Mr. Hoyt stated that                       






Page:  Previous  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011