- 43 - multiple warnings from respondent, warnings that petitioner chose to ignore. We find that petitioner was negligent with respect to entering the Hoyt investment, and that he was negligent with respect to claiming the DSBS 87-C loss on his return. To reflect the foregoing, Decision will be entered for respondent.Page: Previous 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43
Last modified: May 25, 2011