Robert Newstat - Page 31

                                       - 31 -                                         
          petitioner that section 6330 does not afford him an unlimited               
          right to present information in person and at a time or place of            
          his choosing.  If petitioner cannot promptly meet with an Appeals           
          officer to submit documentation and other pertinent data, we                
          would expect him to do so through a representative or by written            
          or telephonic communication.  Otherwise, respondent will be in a            
          position to close petitioner’s 1999 case on the existing record.            
               In conclusion, with respect to 1985, the Court will sustain            
          respondent’s determination to proceed with collection action.               
          With respect to 1999, the Court will remand the case for further            
          proceedings, in the form of a section 6330 hearing, before                  
          Appeals.                                                                    
               To reflect the foregoing,                                              

                                                  An appropriate order will           
                                             be issued.                               




















Page:  Previous  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  

Last modified: May 25, 2011