Annisa M. Owens - Page 5

                                        - 4 -                                         
               Pursuant to section 6214(a) and Rule 41(b),2 respondent                
          moved to increase the amount of the deficiency.  Respondent moves           
          to increase the deficiency because of the alleged error made by             
          Fox Paine when issuing the Form 1099-MISC to petitioner.                    
               Rule 41(b)(2) permits the Court to grant a party's motion to           
          conform the pleadings to the evidence "freely when justice so               
          requires" provided the objecting party is not prejudiced by its             
          admission.  Church of Scientology v. Commissioner, 83 T.C. 381,             
          469 (1984), affd. 823 F.2d 1310 (9th Cir. 1987).                            
               The Court does not find that granting respondent's motion              
          would result in prejudice to petitioner.  The parties agree that            
          petitioner received the full $7,500.  Accordingly, respondent's             
          motion to conform the pleadings to the evidence so as to assert             
          an increased deficiency will be granted.                                    







               2Rule 41(b)(2) provides:                                               
                         (2) Other Evidence:  If evidence is                          
                    objected to at the trial on the ground that                       
                    it is not within the issues raised by the                         
                    pleadings, then the Court may receive the                         
                    evidence and at any time allow the pleadings                      
                    to be amended to conform to the proof, and                        
                    shall do so freely when justice so requires                       
                    and the objecting party fails to satisfy the                      
                    Court that the admission of such evidence                         
                    would prejudice such party in maintaining                         
                    such party's position on the merits.                              




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011