- 5 - 2. Payment Petitioner Received As a general rule, the value of property acquired by gift is not includable in gross income. Sec. 102(a). Gifts are payments made out of detached and disinterested generosity and not in return for past services. Commissioner v. Duberstein, 363 U.S. 278, 285 (1960). Furthermore, a gift must be given out of affection, respect, and admiration. Id. In addition, section 102(c)(1) requires an employee to include in his or her gross income "any amount transferred by or for an employer to, or for the benefit of, an employee." Only in "exceptional" circumstances should a transfer between an employer and an employee be considered a gift in the statutory sense. Commissioner v. Duberstein, supra at 287. If the gift is made solely for personal reasons (such as a birthday or wedding present) and is in no way related to the employment relationship, and no anticipation of business benefit exists, then the gift may qualify for section 102 exclusion treatment. Williams v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2003-97. Only in situations where the relationship between the employer and the employee is personal and the payment is made for reasons unrelated to the work relationship may it be treated as a gift. See Caglia v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1989-143 (finding that payments received by the taxpayer from her employer with whom she traveled for personal pleasure were not taxable);Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011