- 13 - apparently represented by counsel.5 Additionally, the agreement was very specific as to the allocation of each portion of the monetary award. Out of a total of $187,824, only $30,000 was designated for personal injuries, and that amount was explicitly for emotional distress. This then would not seem to be a situation where one party’s tax considerations were allowed to take precedence over the actual nature and significance of the various underlying claims. Petitioners nonetheless argue on brief as follows: The petitioners stated and provided evidence to the Court that payments [sic?] of $30,000.00 was as a result of physical damage to the lips, sustained as a result of years of racial and national origin harassment in the course of his employment at the Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance Company. Medical papers were also presented from Rockville General Hospital and the Institute of Living Medical Group, P.C., substantiating the period, which pre-date the emotional distress treatment. The petitioners asked the Court to disallow the $30,000.00 as taxable, given that emotional distress cited in the “General Release, Confidential Separation Agreement, Waiver and Covenant Not To Sue”, resulted from physical injury to the lips. More so, the complaint of the physical injury, to the CHRO, pre- dates the payment of this $30,000.00, and pre date [sic] treatment of the distress. In summary, we would like the court to see that, it was the physical injury which was sustained at first, that causes severe head ache, delusion, coupled with sustained racial discrimination that led to my 5 Petitioners state in their trial memorandum that the attorney who represented Mr. Oyelola in the civil rights action has been disbarred from the practice of law in Connecticut and cannot be located.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011